Rec League
Art & Design

Fine Art

Art & Design

Browse fine art recommendations from people with great taste on Rec League — the whisper network for great recs.

D logoD
Buy Art from Living Artists

Buy Art from Living Artists

Buying art has been made elusive by a largely inaccessible gallery system. Here are a few ways to buy art from living artists: The most common, expensive, yet vetted route is to go to a gallery, follow their program, and buy work from the gallery. Gallerists take a hefty split, so artists get a fraction of the sale. Typically, you can ask for a discount (it's almost performative), and they will usually give you a 20% discount because it was already built into the price. Depending on the gallery and the work, you may have to prove that your collection is worthy, but this is only for blue-chip (i.e., famous) artists. If you develop a longer term relationship with a gallery, they will often give collectors previews of shows and other insider baseball perks that are sometimes useful, sometimes just weirdly entertaining. Go to an MFA show or a project space, talk to the artists, get to know their work, and they will likely give you a deal or set up a payment plan to make the work more affordable. Most artists want their work in the hands of people who love it and will care for it. Most of us also need money pretty desperately right now. Most of us are willing to work with people who care about our practice. Research past shows of artists in your area or nearby and reach out to them to set up a studio visit or a coffee. Unless they have representation (which means you'd have to go through their gallery, and their work will be more expensive), you can buy work directly out of the studio. This is taboo to gallerists, but artists do it all the time, and it helps us out a lot both financially and in building relationships with engaged collectors. If you go through any of these tracks, please be respectful of the artists time and genuine in your connection to their practice. Be transparent about your budget so artists and/or gallerists can work with you. Or if you aren't ready to buy yet, be transparent about that and clear that you'd like to get to know them + their work for a while. Not assuming you wouldn't, but it's worth saying because not everyone understands the pressures placed on the time and resources of living artists, especially if they are marginalized in any way. So, generally be considerate, transparent, and thoughtful when engaging. Lastly, know that the best "return on your investment" is living with art that you love (and can likely pass on), that you helped to sustain and support living artist(s), and that you didn't settle for an unsatisfying facsimile. Here's a link to the documentary about Herb and Dorothy made by Megumi Sasaki. The film shows how working-class folks amassed a really impressive art collection over their lifetimes with a little passion and a postal worker's salary.

Louise Buckley logoLouise Buckley
Milton Avery at KARMA LA | 2026

Milton Avery at KARMA LA | 2026

The first full-scale survey devoted to Milton Avery’s figurative paintings opened this week at KARMA in LA. Helen Molesworth lead a talk before the opening in which she described him as a "profoundly East Coast painter," something I’d never considered much before but find to be completely true (the horizon lines!!) I’m not as drawn to most of this work visually as I am his landscapes (or even other paintings of people) but I found this show incredibly informative about Avery, his practice, and his place in the cannon. Many of these paintings feel deeply rooted in the social and physical atmosphere of  the 30s and 40s, shaped by the Depression, wartime uncertainty, and the material constraints of everyday life in New York. The subjects, color, and Avery’s restrained use of paint feel of that moment. Some of the paintings immediately conjured Alice Neel for me, who was also painting in New York at the time. A large portion of the work was made in the years following MoMA's 1929 opening, and it’s exciting to think about what Avery was encountering there (Matisse) and what he absorbed, what he translated into his own language, and who he, in turn, was influencing (Rothko, Adolf Gottlieb, Barnett Newman). In addition to situating Avery within a specific time and place, this collection of work continues an ongoing dialogue in my mind about figuration and abstraction. These are paintings of people, but so much of their depth and intrigue is abstract, in the compositions, flattening of space, the looseness of narrative. The figures anchor the work and are more like a point of entry. Sometimes it's an abstract painting and people happen to be there. Avery speaks in his own bold visual language, and in doing so gives enormous permission to painters who come after him. In conclusion, I love the guy and KARMA consistently has such good programming.

D logoD
Commission a Living Artist

Commission a Living Artist

In response to @Emily Teague 's thoughtful question about how to approach commissioning an artist: My perspective is that commissioning artists can work like a short-term collaboration or business partnership, where the collector offers up the parameters (budget, scale, location, practical considerations, maybe even preferred materials already in the artist's oeuvre) and then gives the artist a lot of space without a ton of control. Relinquishing control can be difficult, but it will often reduce tension and frustration within the dynamic. Ideally, you will both have shared interests in relation to the work + project, and you both want those to shine through the collaboration. First, you should have a conversation and then draw up a basic contract (linked here). You can totally hire a lawyer to do this, or you can find a free template online. I'm not a lawyer (lol if that isn't obv) so make an informed decision about the paperwork, but have something in writing that can be revised as needed. Once an artist is equipped with parameters (see above), they could pitch something or a few things, and then you decide which direction to move in. Or you give them parameters, then carte blanche to make the work with concrete deliverables listed in the contract. The second option is usually what most artists prefer, but I get how a proposal process may work better for a collector. I think that artists should get paid for the proposal process, whether or not they are commissioned to do the work; this is also standard practice in larger-scale commissions like percent for art or public art projects. If you go through a pitching phase and are not happy with what is proposed, there should be a contingency that allows the artist to get a stipend for the proposals at the very least. There should also be a limit on the number of proposals the artist is expected to complete before moving forward with the commissioned work. Payment should be decided upfront. I'm a big fan of transparent, itemized budgets (breaking down material costs, artists' fees, shipping, fab, etc.). The artist is responsible for assembling the itemized budget based on the budget provided by the collector initially. If the budget the collector provided is not feasible with the scope and given materials, that is a conversation. I would suggest a deposit for 1/2 the total commission (including artist fees and materials) and the final 1/2 when the work is complete. Most artists can't fund a big project out of pocket and will need 1/2 upfront to buy materials, necessities, etc. I'd also suggest establishing a timeline so that you're both on the same page about the outcome. Some materials take a longer time to work with (cast glass for example), and others are pretty direct (mural painting), so it's helpful to know what the timeline will look like going into it. In the contract, there should be a line about revisions: are they permitted? By whom? How many? What kind? I suggest zero revisions to the final work, but some people are more flexible than me lol. If the artist is not installing the work themselves, that should be discussed upfront, and installation instructions should be included, as well as plans for handlers or installation support if needed. This should also be a line in the contract. If the work will require any maintenance (like outdoor sculpture for example) this should be discussed upfront as well. Who is responsible for the maintenance? If the artist is asked to maintain or touch up the work, they should be paid for this as an independent contractor, and it should be separate from the commission itself. Artists are not responsible for the maintenance of their work after it has been handed off to the collector and/or installed; it is a separate project/fee/conversation later. That should mostly cover it, in general! If you have more questions or more specific questions, you can totally email me anytime (my contact info is on my website d-rosen.com) or set up a call. Oh and a few clear don'ts just in case its helpful (these have all happened to me): If the artist you want to work with is sitting in a dental chair and you have your hands in their mouth, do not ask them to make a bronze sculpture of your dog for your yard. If you have no connection to the artist or their work and you simply want them to make a piece that you have in your mind (say, a giant bald eagle flying off into the sunset), do not ask them to make that piece for you because it will never match what is in your head, and the artist will likely be miserable making it or just say no. You see where I'm going with this? I'm sure you wouldn't do these things, but just noting that artists should be treated with respect, and the conversation should begin with some real knowledge of their practice, which you are planning to invest in. Here's a Wangechi Mutu sculpture simply because I love her work.

There's so much more to explore

Rec League is the whisper network for great recs — thousands of recommendations from people with brilliant, unexpected taste.

Get the app
or sign up on the web